<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Media Offerings of 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about the best in Television, Film and Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Atlas</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clay Atlas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-1374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hold up a sec. 300 &quot;captured ancient Greece as if it had been shot entirely on location&quot; - c&#039;mon... As for the handful of The Office reviews - how about a review of the original/better British version? I guess I understand if you&#039;re not reviewing it because it&#039;s not current...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold up a sec. 300 &#8220;captured ancient Greece as if it had been shot entirely on location&#8221; &#8211; c&#8217;mon&#8230; As for the handful of The Office reviews &#8211; how about a review of the original/better British version? I guess I understand if you&#8217;re not reviewing it because it&#8217;s not current&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Maven</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Maven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said, JT.  Well said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, JT.  Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I LOVED Once for so many reasons, particularly the soundtrack and the emotional nuances. It simply doesn&#039;t fall into the cookie-cutter template that every  Hollywood offering bases its romances on and I found that extremely refreshing. I mean, at its core, it&#039;s a simple love story, but it&#039;s told in such a compelling way that steers clear of cliches. Oh, and the music just blows me away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVED Once for so many reasons, particularly the soundtrack and the emotional nuances. It simply doesn&#8217;t fall into the cookie-cutter template that every  Hollywood offering bases its romances on and I found that extremely refreshing. I mean, at its core, it&#8217;s a simple love story, but it&#8217;s told in such a compelling way that steers clear of cliches. Oh, and the music just blows me away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Maven</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Maven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks KG.  I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll be posting about it, as I try not to be too behind on the times with my posts, but I&#039;d certainly love to chat about it with you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks KG.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be posting about it, as I try not to be too behind on the times with my posts, but I&#8217;d certainly love to chat about it with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kayla</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kayla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonah!  I&#039;m eager for you to see and review Atonement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonah!  I&#8217;m eager for you to see and review Atonement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Maven</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Maven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t feel bad for sharing your opinions --- its what I love!

Just because Snyder is going to stay true to the original doesn&#039;t mean there&#039;s nothing to add cinematically.  Think about the Harry Potter films, or Sin City or 300.  Each were very true to the material from which they were adapted, but each contributes something to the story that only the magic of a movie could.  

If you were Zach Snyder, and you were offered a chance to direct one of the greatest untold comic book stories of all time, are you saying you would turn it down because the original author doesn&#039;t want anyone adapting it?  As a director or an artist, I would leap at the opportunity to tell such a terrific story-- hell, its probably the artist in Snyder that&#039;s jumping for joy as much as it is the businessman, if not more.

I&#039;m not a huge Zach Snyder fan or anything.  But I think its unreasonable to ask a director, someone who makes their living telling stories on the big screen, not to take on a one-of-a-kind tentpole project that dozens of people have unsuccesfully tried to tackle in the past, simply because the somewhat zany creator doesn&#039;t want it adapted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t feel bad for sharing your opinions &#8212; its what I love!</p>
<p>Just because Snyder is going to stay true to the original doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s nothing to add cinematically.  Think about the Harry Potter films, or Sin City or 300.  Each were very true to the material from which they were adapted, but each contributes something to the story that only the magic of a movie could.  </p>
<p>If you were Zach Snyder, and you were offered a chance to direct one of the greatest untold comic book stories of all time, are you saying you would turn it down because the original author doesn&#8217;t want anyone adapting it?  As a director or an artist, I would leap at the opportunity to tell such a terrific story&#8211; hell, its probably the artist in Snyder that&#8217;s jumping for joy as much as it is the businessman, if not more.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a huge Zach Snyder fan or anything.  But I think its unreasonable to ask a director, someone who makes their living telling stories on the big screen, not to take on a one-of-a-kind tentpole project that dozens of people have unsuccesfully tried to tackle in the past, simply because the somewhat zany creator doesn&#8217;t want it adapted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand the studios own the right, and I understand they&#039;re desire to make the movie.  I just don&#039;t think the &quot;job&quot; needs to be done.

Alan Moore and Zach Snyder, I would assume, consider themselves artists, not people working on jobs.  Alan Moore is an established legend who said that he believes what he created shouldn&#039;t be made in to a movie, (I read a specific interview where he said he he wrote Watchmen to be specifically, and only, in comic format).  

So what am I to think of Snyder, who, despite varying opinions, is unestablished - and decides that the movie needs to be made by his decision to make it.   Snyder&#039;s even said in interviews that doesn&#039;t want to add or change anything to the Watchmen, to stay as faithful to it as possible, so what&#039;s the point?  If there&#039;s nothing to add cinematically, and the original creator doesn&#039;t want it adapted, why do it?  I can&#039;t help but think that Snyder wants his name attached to a very influential classic, for that sake alone.  

I&#039;m going to stop now, because I understand you&#039;re a big fan of his, and I don&#039;t think Snyder needs to be bashed unnecessarily.  It&#039;s just a point that&#039;s been irking me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the studios own the right, and I understand they&#8217;re desire to make the movie.  I just don&#8217;t think the &#8220;job&#8221; needs to be done.</p>
<p>Alan Moore and Zach Snyder, I would assume, consider themselves artists, not people working on jobs.  Alan Moore is an established legend who said that he believes what he created shouldn&#8217;t be made in to a movie, (I read a specific interview where he said he he wrote Watchmen to be specifically, and only, in comic format).  </p>
<p>So what am I to think of Snyder, who, despite varying opinions, is unestablished &#8211; and decides that the movie needs to be made by his decision to make it.   Snyder&#8217;s even said in interviews that doesn&#8217;t want to add or change anything to the Watchmen, to stay as faithful to it as possible, so what&#8217;s the point?  If there&#8217;s nothing to add cinematically, and the original creator doesn&#8217;t want it adapted, why do it?  I can&#8217;t help but think that Snyder wants his name attached to a very influential classic, for that sake alone.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to stop now, because I understand you&#8217;re a big fan of his, and I don&#8217;t think Snyder needs to be bashed unnecessarily.  It&#8217;s just a point that&#8217;s been irking me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Maven</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Maven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, to be fair, Zach Snyder didn&#039;t come along and snap up the script.  Watchmen has been in development hell for 20 years, passing from director to director.  After all this time, I&#039;m happy to see it finally being made.

And what does doing one&#039;s job have to do with poor artistic integrity?  Alan Moore is an extreme personality who, as the comic shows, isn&#039;t a huge fan of our society in general.  Moreover, the rights to the film belong to the studio, not the director, and tapping Snyder to direct is an excellent move, both creatively and business-wise.  With 300, Snyder has proven he can make an edgy, low-budget hit movie-- I happen to think he&#039;s a perfect man for the job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, to be fair, Zach Snyder didn&#8217;t come along and snap up the script.  Watchmen has been in development hell for 20 years, passing from director to director.  After all this time, I&#8217;m happy to see it finally being made.</p>
<p>And what does doing one&#8217;s job have to do with poor artistic integrity?  Alan Moore is an extreme personality who, as the comic shows, isn&#8217;t a huge fan of our society in general.  Moreover, the rights to the film belong to the studio, not the director, and tapping Snyder to direct is an excellent move, both creatively and business-wise.  With 300, Snyder has proven he can make an edgy, low-budget hit movie&#8211; I happen to think he&#8217;s a perfect man for the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think 300 has merit.  Zach Snyder is much better and a more interesting director than Uwe Boll and Micheal Bay.  But I just didn&#039;t find the style too innovative or lastingly impressive, and the quasi-fascist drive of the movie left a bad taste in my mouth.

However, I really don&#039;t Snyder&#039;s up to the task of directing Watchmen.  Honestly I think the point is moot, anyway.  When the original creator (Alan Moore) vehemently opposes any adaptations of his work, and Zach Snyder comes along and says, &#039;well I&#039;m gonna do it anyway,&#039; I have to question his artistic integrity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 300 has merit.  Zach Snyder is much better and a more interesting director than Uwe Boll and Micheal Bay.  But I just didn&#8217;t find the style too innovative or lastingly impressive, and the quasi-fascist drive of the movie left a bad taste in my mouth.</p>
<p>However, I really don&#8217;t Snyder&#8217;s up to the task of directing Watchmen.  Honestly I think the point is moot, anyway.  When the original creator (Alan Moore) vehemently opposes any adaptations of his work, and Zach Snyder comes along and says, &#8216;well I&#8217;m gonna do it anyway,&#8217; I have to question his artistic integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Maven</title>
		<link>http://mediamavenmusings.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Maven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamm.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/top-ten-media-offerings-of-2007/#comment-924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment, Anonymous!  I appreciate your insight.

And just as a friendly reminder to all readers, my e-mail address is mediamavenmusings@gmail.com.  Just reminding you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Anonymous!  I appreciate your insight.</p>
<p>And just as a friendly reminder to all readers, my e-mail address is <a href="mailto:mediamavenmusings@gmail.com">mediamavenmusings@gmail.com</a>.  Just reminding you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

